DEMO PREVIEW  ·  This is a non-functional prototype. No data is collected or stored.

What MindBank looks like.

This is a clickable preview of the MindBank platform — what survivors see when they share, and what organizations see when they receive insights. Every screen is a mockup. Nothing is stored. Click into either flow below to walk through it.

Flow 01 — For survivors

The submission journey

Twenty-three screens across eight sections. Trauma-informed prompts, granular consent, stop and exit at every step. Walk through what a contributor actually experiences.

Flow 02 — For organizations

The onboarding & ethical use agreement

What organizations answer before they get access. Includes the binding ethical use agreement and tier selection. See how MindBank pre-screens for fit and accountability.

Flow 03 — For organizations

The insights dashboard

After onboarding, this is what organizations log into: aggregated themes, anonymized stories, smart matching, conduct ratings, recent activity.

Insights overview

Stories accessed
847
+ 124 this quarter
Themes surfaced
23
+ 4 new themes
Active queries
7
2 awaiting review
Conduct rating
4.8
High-trust partner

Top themes — last 90 days

Service navigation gaps
412
Crisis-response delays
348
Discharge transition
287
Peer support access
228
Cultural responsiveness
196
Wait time impact
170

Theme counts represent unique contributor insights, not individual stories. All data anonymized at source.

Recent activity

Smart match query "post-discharge support" returned 47 anonymized themes from 6 region clusters.
Q1 Impact Report submitted to Ethics Council for review.
New consultation request: 4-person advisory circle on triage redesign.
12 new contributors opted into "use in training" consent for your active queries.
Conduct rating updated to 4.8 (from 4.7) following Q4 review.